It is interesting to note each person's likes/dislikes.  I sold both
my FA 24/2.0 and FA 135/2.8 because of poorer performance on my *IstD.
And then there are others who think those are great lenses.  You have
to wonder if it is sample variance or just different expectations.

-- 
Bruce


Friday, January 26, 2007, 3:18:10 PM, you wrote:

>> Yes the Smegma is a good lens optically but I've seen the helicoid
>> grind to a halt in two of these units 

JW> Never came across that problem before on the manual focus ones.

>> and quite a few where the focus
>> scale was well out of alignment.

JW> Assuming that the cheap lettering hadn't already worn off :) Can't remember
JW> ever using the focusing scale though.

>> > The FA24/2, awesome from f/5.6 - F/11
>> 
>> Ah yes, but it's a big lens for a f5.6 and the corners still show
>> pretty bad CA when used on DSLR bodies.

JW> I've not had much opportunity to use it on the D yet, but that's something 
to
JW> look out for, very impressed with the FA35/2, FA50/1.4 and in particular
JW> FA135/2.8.

JW> My K10D arrives Monday or Tuesday, gave the purchase some serious thought,
JW> had to decide whether to buy online (cheaper?) or from the local dealer. It
JW> was a no brainer when my local dealer beat all the internet deals by £34,
JW> couldn't get my debit card out on my pocket fast enough :)

JW> John 

JW> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JW> The information transmitted is intended only for the person
JW> to whom it is addressed and may contain
JW> confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received
JW> an email in error please notify Carmel College
JW> on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

JW> Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails
JW> and email attachments for viruses we cannot
JW> guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor
JW> accept any responsibility for viruses.

JW> Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails
JW> for inappropriate content, the college cannot
JW> be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
JW> The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel
JW> College and Carmel College cannot be held
JW> responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

JW> 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to