On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Jack Davis wrote: > In the past I had a bunch of Lightjet prints made 'til the lab started > using a Lambda. They explained, "...while the print isn't quite as > sharp as a Lightjet, it's faster and, therefore, cheaper in terms of > operator time". > I'm sure I mentioned it at least once on this list, but the Lightjet > prints I was able to compare with other optical and inkjet prints, were > sharper under close scrutiny with the unaided eye. Resolution?? > > Jack
Depends on the model. I believe the original LightJet was 305ppi, with a later version pushing this number up to 406ppi. (For the pedantic, I think the resolution was actually quoted as 12 or 16 pixels/mm, rather than 305 or 406 ppi) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
