The Lambda's apparently have some issues with conventional paper, at least for B&W. Ilford recently started making a paper specifically for the Lambda, Elevator Digital here in Toronto was the test lab for this.
-Adam Jack Davis wrote: > May have to do with the Lightjet's paper exposure process. > > Jack > --- John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:02:41PM -0800, Jack Davis wrote: >>> In the past I had a bunch of Lightjet prints made 'til the lab >> started >>> using a Lambda. They explained, "...while the print isn't quite as >>> sharp as a Lightjet, it's faster and, therefore, cheaper in terms >> of >>> operator time". >>> I'm sure I mentioned it at least once on this list, but the >> Lightjet >>> prints I was able to compare with other optical and inkjet prints, >> were >>> sharper under close scrutiny with the unaided eye. Resolution?? >>> >>> Jack >> Depends on the model. I believe the original LightJet was 305ppi, >> with a later version pushing this number up to 406ppi. >> >> (For the pedantic, I think the resolution was actually quoted >> as 12 or 16 pixels/mm, rather than 305 or 406 ppi) >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Never Miss an Email > Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started! > http://mobile.yahoo.com/services?promote=mail > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
