At 09:05 AM 9/02/2007, you wrote: >On 8/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed: > > >You're probably right, Cotty. But I think the Durst Lambda is reasonably > >high res. I imagine that what Pogue means is that the files were sized > >at 400 DPI for printing. I suspect the printer prints at much higher res > >than that. But it is a laser printer that's designed for pro labs. I > >don't know how it compares to the best inkjets in terms of detail and > >resolution. Perhaps Wheatfield knows. > >Fascinating. I would be very interested to see results like this with my >own eyes. Damn, can't we get a winter masterclass going somewhere in a >warm environment with beer ?
It's going to be about 30 degrees here today. There is a nice pub across the road too. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
