Looks very similar to the first shot. Have you tried a much wider angle lens and perhaps different heights for the shot? Maybe laying down and showing the headstone much more dominant in the foreground or something. The tree seems rather large to get a good shot with that particular focal length. Those are my thoughts.
-- Bruce Tuesday, February 13, 2007, 6:09:42 PM, you wrote: RW> I took Monday off (having worked all weekend), and RW> headed back to the cemetery in the late afternoon to RW> work with that interesting tree. This is one of the RW> results: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5594078 RW> This is the original from a few days earlier: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568647 RW> ist D, FA 50/1.7, ISO 200, RAW, 1/250 @ f.4.5 (I don't RW> know why I set the aperture so small...), via ACR and RW> IE4. RW> Cheers and catcalls both welcome. RW> Rick RW> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW RW> ____________________________________________________________________________________ RW> TV dinner still cooling? RW> Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. RW> http://tv.yahoo.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
