In a message dated 2/13/2007 7:11:37 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: RW> I took Monday off (having worked all weekend), and RW> headed back to the cemetery in the late afternoon to RW> work with that interesting tree. This is one of the RW> results:
RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5594078 RW> This is the original from a few days earlier: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5568647 RW> ist D, FA 50/1.7, ISO 200, RAW, 1/250 @ f.4.5 (I don't RW> know why I set the aperture so small...), via ACR and RW> IE4. RW> Cheers and catcalls both welcome. RW> Rick ========== Agree with Bruce this shot is not a lot different than the first one. IE in terms of distance and positioning, etc. You could can move backward and forward. Or use other lenses or shoot lower down or closer. Uh, trying to say maybe you ought to think about how to "work" the scene. Over the years, being on this list, I've come to understand more and more how much one scene can be worked. The answer is, a lot. Just my .02 cents. Marnie aka Doe ;-) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
