That's what makes the PDML so valuable. Unless you have to be first  
in line, you'll find many opinions and examples here.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:04 PM, William Robb wrote:

>
>
> This is the conundrum of the modern photographer.
> Back when people were willing to support their local camera store,  
> it was
> easy. You decided what you wanted, you went in to buy it.
> If they had to special order it, then there was a delay, but  
> ultimately, you
> got to handle and try out the actual item you were going to purchase.
> Now, no one wants to buy from a local shop, since they have the  
> temerity to
> charge a premium price for the pleasure of serving their customers.
> So, we are stuck with online reviews of questionable merit, and buy  
> products
> based on the opinions of people who may or may not be  
> photographers, and who
> may, or may not (mostly not from the web reviews I have seen), have  
> a clue
> about how to run an equipment test.
> And, we are increasingly being stuck with having to buy equipment  
> sight
> unseen from faceless big box vendors who don't care if we are happy  
> with
> what they are flogging or not, since there are a thousand other  
> suckers that
> day trying to buy other pieces of sight unseen junk based on  
> reviews of
> questionable merit.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to