On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:52:30 -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote
> That's what makes the PDML so valuable. Unless you have to be first  
> in line, you'll find many opinions and examples here.
> Paul

Absolutely and one of the reasons I posed the question, however we're all 
individuals. One of my main problems with ultra wide DSLR lenses is the CA, 
yes I know it can be corrected in RAW conversion but I'd really like not to 
have to. A little distortion, I can live with that, correct it when needed, a 
little vignetting, I can live with that too but less tolerant depending on 
lens and intended purpose.

Regards,

John


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to