What is causing the underexposure? You, the camera, the processing, the flash? I hope you get over this soon.
Frits W�thrich Cory Waters wrote: > Hi list, > Some of you (the ones who have REALLY good memories)may remember that I > Purchased a MZ-5n From Paul Jones in Australia. You may further remember > that I promised my wife that I'd take pictures at a church function to get > out of the doghouse after said purchase. Someone (I forget who) cautioned > me that this could turn into a bad, bad situation. I didn't give it too > much thought. > > This morning I took about 170 pictures at a confirmation > celebration as the > "official" photographer. I was listed in the program and everything. Got > them developed at Wal-Mart this afternoon. > > Disaster. > > Maybe twenty percent of the shots are what I would call acceptable. Might > be five that I'd pay for. Most are WAY underexposed. Do people make > those awful expressions all the time or just for my camera? > My wife says it's not as bad as I think but I know she's just saying that. > > Bright side- won't have to do THAT again. OR "See, I NEED more /better > gear." Wife would make a GREAT assistant to any pro-shooter. > Really, she > was marvelous. > > Dismal side- Embarrassment, disappointment, and shame. > > So I paid more that I thought for that camera. Still It's a really nice > camera. Wonder what lenses I can scheme for before Christmas..... > > Cory Waters > Not deterred and still willing to be enabled in Atlanta. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
