The only comment I read on this comparison lead me to beleive they are both comparable. Pretty much the same kind of rendering. This is only from readings 'cos I defenitely can't afford any of those but what you wrote surprise me very much. Just my 2 cents ...
2007/3/2, J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would dearly love an FA77 f1.8 limited lens and keep an eye out for them > on Ebay. In terms of quality and rendering, from photos I've seen on the > net, the DA70 limited comes a distant second. > > I found an ebay auction today here in Australia for an unused (the buyer > says new, it's not) FA77 limited. The story is he ordered it and only > received it in Feb. Now he's decided to sell it. Whether or not he's used > it, he bought it retail and is now selling it, that makes it used. The > auction has a couple of days to go and has no bids as yet...not surprising > really, since the seller STARTED the auction at $1,100 AUD!!! That's > bordering on criminal! > > Looks like I'll have to settle for a DA70 2.4 limited although they're also > damn pricey. > > Much as I love my K10D, I hate what it and the K100 have done to used glass > prices. :( > > James Messervy > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
