> I'm right with you on the DA 200/2.8. But I don't see that I need the > DA 55, unless it can be shown that it substantially outperforms the > slightly faster FA 50/.4
For me, it's the extra 5mm of FL. I missed the FA50/.4. (<G>). Something like that would keep me happy for a very long time. William Robb ----- It's undoubtedly a replacement for the FA* 85 F1.4. As a portrait lens, it may not be the best distance performer. But we will have to see. I'm still hoping for a DA 400 SDM. And a 1.4x TC. Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
