At 01:26 PM 7/03/2007, Joseph Tainter wrote: > > I'm right with you on the DA 200/2.8. But I don't see that I need the > > DA 55, unless it can be shown that it substantially outperforms the > > slightly faster FA 50/.4 > >For me, it's the extra 5mm of FL. >I missed the FA50/.4. (<G>). Something like that would keep me happy for >a very long time. > >William Robb > >----- > >It's undoubtedly a replacement for the FA* 85 F1.4. As a portrait lens, >it may not be the best distance performer. But we will have to see. > >I'm still hoping for a DA 400 SDM. And a 1.4x TC.
Instead of releasing a bloody "Roadmap" I wish Pentax would hurry the f&#k up and release the damn lenses. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
