On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:47:18AM +0100, Thibouille wrote.. > Yes of course. It often works like that for good (most of the time) reasons.
Because of that "most of the time" clause is exactly the reason why it is a bad idea. Seen this too often with customers (that is in the professional IT area, but the principle of allowing a downgrade remains sound) Wilko > 2007/3/7, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > That's not surprising. I know that's the way I'd design a firmware > > upgrade to work. > > > > Dario Bonazza wrote: > > > Doug Franklin wrote: > > > > > > > > >> Why do you say that, Ken. Am I missing something? It seems to me that > > >> I set up two SD cards, one with the old firmware and one with the new. > > >> A simple swap of the cards and the "magic startup" to load new firmware > > >> and I'm set. Does the 1.11 (or whatever) firmware notice that I'm > > >> trying to load an older version and refuse? > > >> > > > > > > Exactly, just tried that :-( > > > > > > Dario > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf > > thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > ---------------------- > K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net --- end of quoted text --- -- Wilko -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
