Mark, I shoot DNG and don't bother with conversion. Here are my reasons:
1. Hard Disks are not *that* expensive these days.
2. I tried Adobe DNG Converter and somehow I did not like what I saw. A 
strange patch of pixels appeared on the right hand side of the image and 
I decided I'd rather not.
3. I am quite paranoid about originals. So I just keep the originals.

I tried to switch my camera from DNG to PEF. Per 1 GB card camera 
reported that it can fit 60 DNGs and 61 PEFs... Not worth the hassle.

Finally, I do hope that more programs will be able to read DNG. 
Compatibility is worth keeping in one's mind.

Cheers.

Boris-the-conservative.




Mark Cassino wrote:
> Last Sunday I took some shots of a choral recital. I wanted to shoot RAW 
> because the lighting was tricky (in a church, no flash allowed, half the 
> group in full stain-glass filtered sun, half in the gloomy chancel). I 
> decided to use PEF vs DNG, just so I could squeeze enough photos on the 
> card to avoid changing cards while shooting.
> 
> Of course I forgot about the PEF setting and yesterday went out shooting 
> wildflowers using PEF as opposed to DNG for about 350 shots.
> 
> I may be crazy, but the ISO 400 shots I took yesterday - under pretty 
> gloomy overcast skies and flat light - seem to have more noise in the 
> backgrounds than the DNG shots I've been taking up till now. I haven't 
> done a scientific comparison, but I've looked at a lot of shots taken as 
> DNG's at ISO 400, and these certainly seem different. Not to the point 
> of being unacceptable - but just some cyan-magenta sprinkles.
> 
> Last Sunday's choir shots were taken at ISO 800, plus I had to do a lot 
> of shadow,highlight, and color temp adjustment while processing the RAW 
> files to compensate for the lighting situation. Those were more noisy 
> than I'm used to, but I figured that was the inevitable result of higher 
> ISO (I almost never go above 400) and the adjustments.
> 
> Has anyone else switched back and forth between the two formats and seen 
> a difference?
> 
> - MCC
> 
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to