I think he means that with the switch to digital, the average photographer has become more concerned with technical perfection. I believe that this is generally true. With film, only those who did their own darkroom work had absolute control. Now nearly all advanced photographers can take complete control of their workflow. So they are more aware of faults and strive to eliminate them. This transfers to the judging criteria as well. Probably a good thing in many ways. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > mike wilson wrote: > >>From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >>Overall - it was a pretty interesting experience. I always imagined > >>judges looking at my photos like I look at them - pouring over them for > >>a long time, looking at the nuance and detail. I should of put 2 + 2 > >>together - when you consider the numbers of photos they are looking at, > >>it's a pretty snap judgment process. And the slightest technical fault > >>can get your image booted... > > > > > > Your impressions coincide with my belief of the direction photography is > > going > since the advent of consumer digital equipment. It would be interesting to > get > the impression of someone who has been regularly judging during the > changeover > from chemical to digital. > > Not sure what you mean here. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
