Ditto. DPReview is just okay. They don;t seem to completely grasp why differences in in-camera processing could swing either way. Nor why RAW results are more important. But rest assured that all DPReview tests will, from this day forward, be very positive. Money talks. Paul On May 14, 2007, at 8:28 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and > features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. > > Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which > is misinformed. > > Thus it is a source of misinformation. > > G > > > On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: > >> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out >> there for >> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree >> with the >> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, >> quality of >> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own >> cameras. >> >> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
