The major issue I have with Phil is his insistence on testing primarily in JPEG mode. His tests are designed for, and quite good for, P&S cameras. They do not adequately reflect real-world SLR performance.
-Adam Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and > features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. > > Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which > is misinformed. > > Thus it is a source of misinformation. > > G > > > On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: > >> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out >> there for >> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree >> with the >> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, >> quality of >> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own >> cameras. >> >> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
