Tom C wrote: >>Furthermore, their emphasis on JPEG over Raw in their image quality >>assessments is completely outdated now. It might have made sense years >>ago, when Raw shooters were a small niche in the digital market, but >>they're not any more. In fact, amongst the people who really *care* >>image quality, such as DP Review claimed to be testing, they're the >>majority. > >They're still the overall minority if I'm not mistaken.
Yes, the overall minority. But not the minority of people critical about image quality and not the minority of DP Review users. That's the irony of DP Review: In both their emphasis on unaltered JPEG output and their testing of cameras without eliminating the lens as a variable, they're writing their reviews for average Joes who don't read DP Review, rather than the people who *do* read DP Review. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
