I figure I'd grab the lenses the reputation was established by. And who knows, one of these days I may want to shoot film....
I saw Godfreys pics and they're really nice. I need to figure out whether I can use that focal length or whether i can justify the purchases. Sigh. This is what enablement is? On 5/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The new generation limited lenses aren't crappy. For example, Godders > demonstrated how the new 70 is easily the equal of the old 77. > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: AlexG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So I've been eyeballing the limited lenses.... The real, fast ones not > > the slow crappy new generation ones. > > > > It occurs to me that there is something seriously wrong because a > > month ago I would never even consider any of them, but it seems that > > now i have no qualms about spending the equivalent of a brand new k10d > > on a single god damned lens. > > > > And this is not even for any realistic gain in lens performance or > > image quality. A month ago, I went with the k100d instead of the k10d > > because the extras in the k10d were not, to me, worth the extra 400 > > bucks. And they still aren't but I'm mentally prepared to pull the > > trigger on ultrapremium glass. > > > > What the hell is wrong with me? > > > > Am I trying to fill a very distinct void in my life with nice toys > > instead of dealing with the deeper issues? > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
