Steve Desjardins wrote: >I'm sure of that <g>. What exactly? Do people use raw files like some >kind of super negative for later work? >
I think he meant you didn't send us links to any examples..... :) - I've started shooting nothing but raw after I saw what I could rescue because of it.... I do the raw converting in photoshop elements 5.0 although I have a file converter that came with the darkside camera too and I dont think I could have gotten away with some of the stuff I shot over the weekend if I had not been shotting raw. I tend not to shoot quite as freely as a result of not having as much room on a card and I think thats a good thing. As it is there are too many decisions to make But Mark Roberts and others can explain better why it is "a good thing" ann > > > >>>>"David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/9/2007 10:27 AM >>> >>>> >>>> >Steve, I think your missing something :-) > >Cheers, > >Dave > >On 7/9/07, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Hey folks, >> >>I've been playing with some raw files using Pentax Photo Laboratory. >>I've been using raw+ so I can compare my results with the in-camera >> >> >JPG. > > >> I usually set the sharpening higher but these are outdoor shots and >> >> >the > > >>default color is pretty good. I save them to JPG and they look >> >> >similar > > >>to the in-camera JPGs. So: >> >>1. Are these well exposed pictures not challenging enough to show >> >> >much > > >>difference? >>2. Am I doing the RAW PP wrong? >>3. Am I just not very picky? >> >>I know this sounds funny, but I'm new to this RAW thing and I wonder >> >> >if > > >>I'm missing something. >> >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
