Paul Stenquist wrote: >Both the 105 and the 98 have their supporters and detractors. I have >the 105 and have been very happy with it. But if you would like to go >wider, the 75/2.8 appears to be a fabulous lens. That was Aaron's >favorite, and most of the pics he posted here were shot with that >lens. However, it's only a few years old, so is pricier than the >others. I would avoid the 75/4.5. The reviews are very mixed. Perhaps >there is sample variation, and it may well be telling that Pentax >chose to replace it with an upgraded lens.
Hmm. Pity. I've heard from almost everyone that the 105 is better than the 90, but I do prefer the slightly more "relaxed" angle of view. The news about the 75 is more discouraging, but your reasoning makes sense. I think I'll go for a 90. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
