> Rebekah wrote: >> They don't belong, have no >> natural predators, and killing them on site is the best thing. > In what way is it the 'best' thing?
I didn't write that rg2 On 9/3/07, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: > John Graves > > I am probably restating something but here in Massachusetts, there are > > groups that feed and capture feral cats. After capture, they are > > neutered and returned to the wild. We also have a substantial > > population of coyotes that don't mind tangling with a feral cat or two. > > > > John G. > > > > Rebekah wrote: > >> They don't belong, have no > >> natural predators, and killing them on site is the best thing. > > In what way is it the 'best' thing? > > They have that around here too, but feral cats aren't the same threat to > local fauna in Massachusetts or North Carolina that they are in > Australia or New Zealand. > > They do have natural predators around here, for the most part feral > dogs. We don't have the coyotes, but they're headed this way (mainly due > to the elimination of *their* natural predators). > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
