Granted but given the current roadmap the 60-250 is a bit of an odd
fit.  A 135-400 f/4 would or a 135-3make a lot more sense to complete
the line up.

16-50 f/2.8 (24-75 equiv)
50-135 f/2.8 (75-200 equiv)
135-400 f/4 (200-600 equiv)

That would be a coherent line up...

Rgds

Patrick

On 9/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The DA* 60-250/4 will be here soon, so it wouldn't make much sense to redo 
> the FA* 80-200/2.8. I believe one reason for not retaining FA lens designs is 
> that the new DA and DA* lenses are optimized for the APS-C image circle. And 
> of course new releases stimulate sales.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > It seems to me that people are confusing out of production with
> > > discontinued. As far as I understand, all camera companies produce their
> > > lenses in batches to a certain degree, and just because a lens is not
> > > being produced right now, you should not assume it's not in the line-up
> > > anymore. It may well be that production was temporarily halted because
> > > there is already stock to last for a long time.
> >
> > The pentax japan web site does not list any of the old FA* lenses...
> > All gone... bar the 300 f/2.8 and the 600 f/4 .. The problem is there
> > are no replacements.  I'm no expert on lens production etc but how
> > hard can it be to update an already excellent lens design such as the
> > 80-200 f/2.8 and bring it in line with current digital requirements
> > and maybe even add an SDM motor.  Im sure it is quicker than designing
> > the 50-135 from scratch and they would have had a much more desirable
> > product. Other manufacturers seem to be able to do this quite quickly.
> >
> > Patrick Genovese
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to