Thank you, William. You are right: difficult lighting is just plain difficult.
The speck on the subject's face is definitely white. Also, I looked at the negative. There seems to be a speck on the neg. It is difficult to tell for sure, though. Glen On Oct 3, 2007, at 9:45 AM, William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Glen Tortorella" > Subject: Disappointing Results > > >> Hi all, >> >> Since I have a new, more "advanced" body, the N80, I tried taking >> some shots I would have avoided in the past. The results were >> awful-- >> not one good shot on the entire role, a miserable 0-for-24 (Kodak >> Gold 200). >> >> In the past, I would avoid two types of shots: 1) indoor shots and 2) >> outdoor "high sun" shots in the fair weather months (i.e. during the >> hours of about 10:00-4:00). In doing so, I have assured myself >> decent, but not necessarily perfect, results. Since the N80 has a >> better metering system (10-segment) and a pop-up flash that is >> supposed to be pretty good, I figured: "let me see what it can do." >> As I have said, the results were dreadful. Here are the main issues. >> >> 1) Every indoor flash shot showed at least moderate spotlight/wash- >> out effect of the subject (people). >> 2) On the outdoor "high sun" shots, the camera turned a seemingly >> minor shadows (through the viewfinder) on the subject's face into a >> black blobs that covered almost all of the subject's face. >> 3) When taking indoor shots with the flash, I would meter (10- >> segment) something like 1/30 or 1/45 or perhaps 1/60 at, say, f2. >> With the flash powered up, I do not think it ever metered >> differently. For example, 1/30 at f/2 was still 1/30 at f/2 with the >> flash enabled. Is this correct, or is there something wrong with my >> camera? >> 4) The one decent shot in the whole role--an indoor shot using only >> available light...go figure?--was spoiled by some sort of small speck >> on the subject's face. I usually keep my filter free of dust, etc. >> Could this speck have appeared as a result of the cheap processing I >> used (Wal-Mart C-41)? >> >> I know that using a fill flash may have alleviated the problem >> expressed in issue number 2, but, since I have had my subjects turn a >> bit ghastly by using the flash, I am hesitant to use it indoors or >> outdoors. I would appreciate any advice or commentary (or even pep >> talk), as I am pretty down about this. What good is a more >> "advanced" camera if I cannot even come remotely close to >> satisfactory results on the more difficult shots (i.e. indoor, "high >> sun," etc.)? > > You seem to have discovered one of the rules of photography that I > like the > best, which is that good equipment can't compensate for bad > photography. > Difficult lighting situations are difficult because of their > nature, not > because of less than savvy cameras. > Was the spot on the subject's face white or black? > If it's white, it's dust on the film at the time of printing, which > isn't a > big deal, if it's black, then it's dust on the film at the moment of > exposure. > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
