Even the moon is slimmer in California. :-) As for the photo, - I am not sure if it works for me or not. I think, the first impression/thought that I had was the ~1:2 ratio of the image dimensions. Time-to-time I have problems with the image proportions deviating from one of the standard ratios (2:3, 3:4).
A while ago, somebody posted a link to a technique that allows to shrink(compress) photos only in some parts of them. Probably this image would benefit from that - if the portion between the RHS of the lake and the moon is compressed. Igor Wed Oct 17 17:42:07 EDT 2007 P. J. Alling wrote: I expected a big fat moon. This really is low key. Bruce Dayton wrote: > Taken this past Saturday in Pt Reyes near San Francisco. We actually > went to see some of the wildlife and at the end of the day on the way > back, we were confronted with the scene. I have rendered it just as > we saw it. It was a fairly low key, peaceful scene rather than an > overly punchy scene. > > Pentax K10D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 70mm, Tripod mounted > ISO 200, 4 sec @ f/5.6, manual everything > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/ptreyes_0137a.htm > > In light of the discussions, I guess some may like this and say so, > some may critique, some may nothing and possibly no one will comment. > But that is ok, I'll deal with whatever comes. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
