Thanks Bruce. The only pleasure I take in redundantly shooting the moon is trying to better a previous shot. A crystal clear, very dry night is what's needed. Of course, some nice composites can be made using old Mr. Moon in combination with something else. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, it is a better moon than I have ever done and I have even > cheaper glass than you do for that kind of thing. Nice shot. > > -- > Bruce > > > Friday, October 26, 2007, 7:38:54 AM, you wrote: > > pcn> The Halloween precursor full moon crept in last night, and > pcn> I celebrated with a wee bit of scotch. So I had to try to see if > pcn> I could get a decent pic with my bargain big glass: the A400/5.6 > pcn> plus the A2X-S converter. There was some water vapor in the air, > pcn> so I think I can top this on a perfect night. But this shot is > pcn> better than the moon I sold through the stock house a couple > pcn> years ago. Not as good, of course, as the one Ken shot with his > pcn> gimble mount and FA 600/4. But it comes at less than a tenth of > pcn> the price. By the way, after shooting, I did a bit of barking and > pcn> danced naked in the backyard. The neighbors appreciated that. > pcn> Anyway, here's the moon: > pcn> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6569744&size=lg > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
