> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill D. Casselberry [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3
>
> Paul wrote:
>
> > It takes a smaller filter if memory serves correctly, and other
> > than that, everything that Mike Steele said is true!
>
> I'm sure the filter is smaller, my 1963 version 300mm f4
> Takumar takes 82mm filters! I have the matching 200mm f5.6
> Tele-Takumar (my first Pentax lens @ US$50 w/ case, hood&caps)
> and it is a nice sharp lens. Also a pre-set, w/ 49mm filters.
>
> Bill
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
>
> http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------
Bill,
I don't have calipers with me. But based on what is written on the
hood and comparing with a 52mm lens cap the size appears to be a 58mm.
C�sar Matamoros II
Panama City, Florida
in Hollywood, Florida
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
