Mine and I haven't even tried it. :-) I haven't forgiven Kodak for adopting a different grain scale for their film, making comparisons of specs between Kodak and other mfr.'s difficult if not impossible.
Tom C wishing he wouldn't say stupid things like this. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:01 PM Subject: Re: Why is Kodak Gold Max evil? > William Robb wrote, in part: > > > The Max 400-7 and 800-3 has cured a lot of the problems that the > > Max film exhibited. > > Regarding price point, where I am, Fuji and Kodak cost the same. > > I suspect that in the USA, if Fuji tried to sell Superia for > > significantly less than what Kodak is selling Gold and Max films > > for, the ever vigilant US Department of Commerce would be all > > over the situation like a bad smell. > > So Max has evolved to cover Kodak mistakes. Does current generation > Max still lag, in anyone's opinion, behind Superia? > > -Lon > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
