And I still wish you had that website up. I could host it if you want. Do you still have the HTML intact and the .jpgs? You could mail be a Zip disk... just thinking. I went there often.
Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:56 PM Subject: Re: Why is Kodak Gold Max evil? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "aimcompute" > Subject: Re: Why is Kodak Gold Max evil? > > > > Mine and I haven't even tried it. :-) > > > > I haven't forgiven Kodak for adopting a different grain scale > for their > > film, making comparisons of specs between Kodak and other > mfr.'s difficult > > if not impossible. > > > > Tom C wishing he wouldn't say stupid things like this. > > Sorry, sometimes I am a bit harsh.... > > A couple of years ago, I did a bunch of film tests involving > microscopic examinations of the grain structures of as many > print films as I could lay my hands on. This was done in part > because of Kodak's nonsensical PQI method of grain measurement, > and my rather foolish pronouncement that Kodak films were > technically every bit as good as Fuji. It turned out that Kodak > wasn't even close. The Kodak films came off looking pretty bad > compared to Fuji when I put them under the microscope. > William Robb > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
