> > I pay a subscription to Amateur Photographer!! > Perhaps a subscription cancellation accompanied by a stiff letter of complaint is in order..
Peter Fairweather wrote: > Give the guy some credit, he was a trailblazer who transcended the > petty link between the review of a camera and the need to actually > hold it. > > Many have followed his lead. In next Tuesday's "Amateur Photographer" > there is a comparison between the Canom 1DsIII, medium format film and > the Mamiya ZD. > > The reviewer states that whether the Canon can produce "better" images > than medium format film is a "very subjective question" A detailed > comparison will follow at a later date. (never knew detailed meant not > imaginary!) > > The ZD is given an arbitrary points reduction to allow for "progress" > in general standards of photographic equipment since it was tested in > 2006. > > And the WINNER with 92% is the only contestant actually looked at - > the Canon. Medium format film has no actual score but still comes > second ahead of the ZD on 79%. > > And you ingrates think that Kenny boy is unscientific and cavalier in > his opinions. At least he is free unless you voluntarily send him some > money. I pay a subscription to Amateur Photographer!! > > Peter > > On 26/01/2008, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:11:48PM -0500, Scott Loveless wrote: >> >>> Perry Pellechia wrote: >>> >>>> Here is the original post archived for all eternity: >>>> >>>> http://web.archive.org/web/20040219184659/www.kenrockwell.com/pentax/istD.htm >>>> >>>> Where he admits: >>>> >>>> "I haven't played with it. I will presume image quality is the same as >>>> the other real DSLRs like the Nikon D100 and Canon 10D, and far >>>> superior to compact non-SLRs like the Sony DSC-F828 and other >>>> point-and shoots." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> That's not quite the original. Initially, he never said that it should >>> be considered. He basically trashed it based on personal bias. Shortly >>> thereafter there was a little disclaimer at the top about the "fan mail" >>> he received concerning his "review". . . . >>> >> Still not quite right. What originally showed up after the negative mail >> wasn't "a little disclaimer" - it was a transparently self-serving attempt >> at justification of his so-called review by an ad-hominem attack on those >> who had had the effrontery to criticize him. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> >> > > -- I am personally a member of the Cream of the Illuminati. A union with the Bavarian Illuminati is contemplated. When it is complete the Bavarian Cream Illuminati will rule the world -- Anonymous -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
