Well said. Cleaning up the planet offers benefits at every level. And  
it won't make it colder next winter:-).
Paul
On Feb 17, 2008, at 4:31 AM, Bob W wrote:

>
> http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller/miller21.html
>
> We should take this one very seriously indeed. It's hosted by a
> Rockwell, so it must be right.
>
> In many important ways it doesn't matter one bit whether global
> warming is happening or not because the measures we should be taking
> to reduce it are things we should be doing anyway because they make
> our lives much pleasanter.
>
> Fossil fuel emissions are filthy and unhealthy. They choke our cities
> and our countryside, and they make the lives of millions, if not
> billions of people thoroughly unpleasant. Cleaner, sustainable fuels
> must be a good thing - the only possible downside to them is the cost,
> and we're plenty rich enough to afford it. Anyone who remembers what
> British cities were like before the Clean Air Act must know what a
> difference it made; even better results are likely to accrue from a
> global clean-up, whether it saves the planet or not.
>
> Similar reasoning applies to recycling our rubbish, reducing landfill,
> plastic and so on. What arguments can people produce in favour of
> continuing the way we've been going for so long, polluting and abusing
> our habitat? All this filth and crap that we dump makes our lives, and
> the lives of billions, far worse than it needs to be. What's wrong
> with cleaning it up just for the sake of improving our lives? We
> shouldn't need the pistol of global warming to be held to our temples
> to make us do the right thing.
>
> The only people who argue against this are the polluters themselves,
> who don't suffer from their filth and crap anyway, and stand to lose
> some of their $$$ billions. Tough luck on them.
>
> Bob
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Scott Loveless
>> Sent: 17 February 2008 05:00
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Global warming: Icy lolipops
>>
>>
>> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/02/070228-mars-wa
>> rming.html
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/07/1
>> 8/wsun18.xml
>> http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/04/29/is-global-warmin
>> g-solar-induced/
>> http://www.lewrockwell.com/miller/miller21.html
>> http://www.livescience.com/environment/070312_solarsys_warming.html
>> http://www.aip.org/pnu/2003/split/642-2.html
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy#Altern
>> ate_hypotheses
>> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/03/030321075236.htm
>>
>> But it's just a crackpot theory.  It's not like they're ALL
>> scientists.
>>   You know, like us.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
> and follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to