Carlos, If you'd be interested in a general impression. Based solely on my recollection of the focusing speed of the MZ-S (sold in the fall of '07), I'd have to say that the K10D is certainly no slower and it wouldn't surprise me if it were slightly faster. I have no sense of the difference with regard to their relative focus performance at various light levels.
Jack --- Carlos Royo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boris Liberman escribió: > > Carlos, the best way to proceed for you, I think, is to arrange for > > simultaneous demonstration. > > > > > Thanks for your answer, Boris. I have tried a K10D in a shop, with > the > kit lens, but I'm afraid that using it with the kit lens for a pair > of > minutes isn't a meaningful test, at least in my view. At least it > gives > you a feeling on how the body fits in your hands, though. If I were > Ken > Rockwell, it would be the most extensive in-deep test he's ever done > and > I would be able to write one of his very informative reviews, but I > haven't got his skills and profound knowledge ;-) > > That's why I am hopeful that someone in the PDML who has used or > still > uses both cameras can enlighten me. > > > There are cases when I find K10D AF lacking in speed and > mechanical > > hmmm prowess, so to say. > > > > Can you elaborate a bit more on this, if it is possible? Thanks. > > Carlos > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
