Carlos, I agree with Godfrey to that end that the precision of exposure matters more and more as ISO grows.
Generally I shoot between ISO 100 and ISO 320. I used to avoid ISO 640 and up but most recent shooting during that rock show proved me wrong. I have received some quite good shots IQ-wise. It also depends on the mastery of post-processing, which of course is a limitless sky. Boris Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > I've always found the K10D to be about on par with the DS. It has > better dynamic range at ISO 1600 but a slightly noisier appearance if > you don't get the exposure right on the money. Others have complained > bitterly about noise, pattern artifacts, etc etc, but I've not seen > them in my work. > > I find the K10D to be cleaner than the DS at ISO 800, which most of > the time is as high as I use. > > The DS' ISO 3200 setting I only used a couple of times ... it simply > wasn't very usable at all for my work. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
