Boris Liberman escribió: > Carlos, I agree with Godfrey to that end that the precision of exposure > matters more and more as ISO grows. > > Generally I shoot between ISO 100 and ISO 320. I used to avoid ISO 640 > and up but most recent shooting during that rock show proved me wrong. I > have received some quite good shots IQ-wise. > > It also depends on the mastery of post-processing, which of course is a > limitless sky. >
Thanks Boris and Godfrey for your comments on high ISO and the K10D. I sometimes use ISO 800 (and sparsely 1600) with the DS when I'm shooting indoors in order to get enough shutter speed to avoid camera shake. Results at 800 are really good, the DS shines at that ISO speed, and they are good at 1600 if correctly exposed like you say. The K10D has the advantage to allow the user to select the ISO speed in finer steps, and that sounds attractive to me. I am more and more inclined to get a K10D because know it can be bought new at very good prices, in fact it is the biggest bargain in the market now, in my view. It won't be as hot as the K20D, but I think it may serve me well in the years to come. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
