Wish I knew. But the * should suggest quite higher quality as well as price, shouldn't it?
Carl -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack Davis Sent: 17. mars 2008 16:44 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: DA 55-300 f4-5.8 ED FYI: While voting a few minutes ago, I noted an image that claimed to have been shot with a DA 55-300 f/4-5.8 ED. Last roadmap I saw it was in the "To Be Released" category. Couldn't make any sort of judgment about its performance based on one "fairly decent" image. This lens is competing with the DA*60~250, from a standpoint of price, in my mind, if only to justify the additional $$ for the DA*. Jack ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
