Actually, it's the 50~200 performance examples I've seen that have me wondering about the 55~300. Realistically, I'm pretty much set to go for the *.
Jack --- Roman Melihhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DA* 60-250 is SDM lense, DA 55-300 isnt, but if its same picture > quality > as DA 50-200mm f4-5.6 makes - it's all good. > > > -- > K100D Super, DA10-17mm, DA16-45mm, DA50-200mm, Dörr DStudio strobes > roman.blakout.net <http://roman.blakout.net> > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Jack > Davis > Sent: 17. mars 2008 16:44 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: DA 55-300 f4-5.8 ED > > FYI: While voting a few minutes ago, I noted an image that claimed to > have been shot with a DA 55-300 f/4-5.8 ED. Last roadmap I saw it was > in the "To Be Released" category. > Couldn't make any sort of judgment about its performance based on one > "fairly decent" image. This lens is competing with the DA*60~250, > from > a standpoint of price, in my mind, if only to justify the additional > $$ > for the DA*. > > Jack > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
