2008/5/8 Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Of these I like > > > http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2361/2264457467_3715e407a7_o.jpg > > http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2070/1873614000_eb7bcffdb4_o.jpg > > http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2391/2105976158_f5943358b8_o.jpg > > http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1207/1156628029_59615df340_o.jpg
Thanks Godfrey > I don't know that a rectilinear ultrawide is that much less > challenging to use compared to an FE, but it is appropriate to a > greater range of what I shoot, it seems. In fisheye lenses, I have > both the DA10-17 that I use on the K10D and the Pentax Fish-Eye- > Takumar that I use on the panny and oly bodies, in rectilinears I > have the DA14 for the K10D and ZD 11-22 for the panny and oly. > Overall I get good results with both but I find FE work becomes > somewhat gimmicky looking a little faster than rectilinear work. By less challenging, I mean you don't have to worry about the FE perspective. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
