For got to add that it was shot at ISO 1600 for 1.5 min. Cheers,
Dave At 10:59 AM 2/07/2008, David Savage wrote: >Those are shot at ISO 100 Brendan. I don't recommend high ISO for >this kind of shooting. > >I do use high ISO test shots to help work out exposure times for ISO >100. Such as this one to determine how much light painting I needed: > ><http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/Vacant%20Eyes.jpg> > >Unfortunately my cable release developed a fault after this shot (I >also got attacked by some bees that my torch had disturbed) so I >never got the final shot. > >Cheers, > >Dave > > > > >At 01:01 AM 2/07/2008, Brendan MacRae wrote: > >David, > > > >Why high ISOs at all for shots like these? Here's a 36 > >minute exposure of some star trails I did last year > >with the K10D: > > > >http://www.primelensphoto.com/star_trails.jpg > > > >Notice the tiny bit of sensor bloom in the upper > >middle left of the frame. > > > >This was RAW, ISO 100, f6.3. Can't remember which > >lens. The white balance was set to AWB but probably > >should have been set to daylight (that's what stars > >are after all). > > > >Now, I'm at 2,500 feet above sea level with very > >little ambient light around my place so I have much > >better natural conditions to shot under for this kind > >of shot. > >-Brendan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
