I also remember "mathematical proofs" of why we would need at least 22 MP sensors before we could replace film. <vbg>
>>> "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/1/2008 11:00 AM >>> I just find this little tidbit interesting. Does anyone remember the argument that the K mount wasn't wide enough for a full frame sensor, that only Canon had a lens mount wide enough to support it, and every other manufacturer would have to redesign their lens mounts. Well Nikon's F mount is a smaller diameter than the K mount and they seem to having no problems at all. Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yeah, I don't think it will take that long. There may well be an > interim product that will spur sales a bit -- a K30D. And of course > more DA* lenses. They'll survive as a second tier player. > Paul > On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:53 AM, David Savage wrote: > > >> 2008/7/1 Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> If the Nikon D700 starts out at three grand and hits 2500 within a >>> year, >>> I'm guessing around $2000.00 for a Pentax full-frame in 2010. I'll >>> order >>> the first one that hits B&H :) >>> >> If it takes 2 more years for them to release a FF DSLR they are going >> to be well and truly behind the 8 ball in the sales game. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. >> > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:486a4773263741019117646! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
