This is an interesting application of *Gresham's law* . Steve Desjardins wrote: > I also remember "mathematical proofs" of why we would need at least 22 > MP sensors before we could replace film. <vbg> > > >>>> "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/1/2008 11:00 AM >>> >>>> > I just find this little tidbit interesting. Does anyone remember the > argument that the K mount wasn't wide enough for a full frame sensor, > that only Canon had a lens mount wide enough to support it, and every > other manufacturer would have to redesign their lens mounts. Well > Nikon's F mount is a smaller diameter than the K mount and they seem > to > having no problems at all. > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Yeah, I don't think it will take that long. There may well be an >> interim product that will spur sales a bit -- a K30D. And of course >> > > >> more DA* lenses. They'll survive as a second tier player. >> Paul >> On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:53 AM, David Savage wrote: >> >> >> >>> 2008/7/1 Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> >>>> If the Nikon D700 starts out at three grand and hits 2500 within a >>>> > > >>>> year, >>>> I'm guessing around $2000.00 for a Pentax full-frame in 2010. I'll >>>> > > >>>> order >>>> the first one that hits B&H :) >>>> >>>> >>> If it takes 2 more years for them to release a FF DSLR they are >>> > going > >>> to be well and truly behind the 8 ball in the sales game. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> > > >>> and follow the directions. >>> >>> >> >> > > >
-- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
