Brian,

It's a hard call.
I like the photoshopped picture.  It is more pleasing than the original.
But it troubles me knowing it is 'photoshopped'.

I expect paintings to be paintings and photos to be photos.
I expect paintings to be a truly imaginary concoction,
perhaps based on real life but without strict rules on veracity.
I expect photos to be mostly a capture of a real scene,
perhaps manipulated a little bit, but with a lot of faithfulness to
the original scene.
With enough manipulation, photos stop being photos and become another art form.
Perhaps photo montage would be the right name for them.

Your question stirs the pot on the whole issue.
I expect paintings(etc) to be beautiful or moving in composition,
colors, ideas overall.
I expect photos to be beautiful for the capture of a real scene, real
light, real detail.
It becomes a matter of expectations.
In the painting(etc) art world, we suspend expectations of perfect
representation
and enjoy the other aspects of the work.
In the photo world, I expect the picture is highly representational of
what you can see.
(Of course artists blur these lines in 1,000 different ways, with
painted canvases that
look like photos and photos that look like paintings.)

But for me, I like to look at photos and think that they show something real and
marvel at how the photographer was able to get the shot.

(Next time, take the chain saw!)  ;-)

Regards,  Bob S.

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This may have been discussed previously but I thought it might be worth
> canvassing PDMLers' views, in the light of Ann's comments on my recent
> "Stumped - Take 2" PESO.
>
> I think most people would regard the recent "Iran Missile" fiasco as
> being in the "way too much" category and a few journalists have got
> themselves into strife in recent years by 'sexing up' news images.
> Although photography has always been a weapon of propaganda, well before
> the digital age, these are distorting history and can't be justified.
>
> At the other extreme, removing the odd dust spot or maybe a distracting
> leaf or branch would probably be regarded as being OK by most people.
>
> But what about the middle ground - when do we step over the line?
>
> I'll offer my two PESO's as examples (these aren't wonderful images but
> they serve to illustrate the point):
>
> http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/95749/Stumped.html
> http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/95818/Stumped_-_Take_2.html
>
> Even the first one had some photoshopping - I removed some intrusive
> branches on the left.  It never occurred to me to mention this in the
> original post. Should I have mentioned it?
>
> The second one was more drastic and involved removal of a stump on the
> left.  This was suggested by Paul, and others seemed to agree that it
> was acceptable (and an improvement).  Ann, however, thought I'd gone too
> far. In retrospect, I think Ann is probably right in this case.  I have
> changed what is there and, as I intend using the image in a 'River
> Environs' project, I probably should use the original for that project.
>
> As a pure image, however, taken out of the "River Environs' context, the
> second image 'works better', in my opinion.
>
> So what do you think - not specifically about these images but as a
> general view.  Even the great photographers of the past weren't shy when
> it came to 'improving' images - a dodge and burn here; a replacement sky
> there....  I sometimes wonder what some of the great photographers of
> the past would have thought about Photoshop, had they been alive to use
> it.  In many
> cases, I'm sure they would have regarded it as another useful tool to
> help in
> their craft.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Brian Walters
> Western Sydney Australia
> http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
>
> --
>
>
> --
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to