But the marketers test those web ads by counting click throughs and comparing that number to sales of featured products. They have to work, or they're gone. That being said, it's probably a bit too soon to say for sure how well the Adorama ads on photo.net work, but I suspect they already have a rough idea. And the initial media buy was probably for thirty days before Christmas.
Paul
On Nov 27, 2008, at 12:11 AM, John Sessoms wrote:

From: "Bob W"
The photo.net ads are only marginally less annoying - at least they don't come with sound. Why don't these people learn? Don't they test people's reactions to their to their stupid, sophomoric ideas? The first lessons in user interface design are: Don't piss off your user; don't put animations on
the screen; don't use sound unless it's easy to turn it off.

Generally, they test them by getting other stupid, sophomoric web developers to check it out. So the feed-back they get from their testers is as moronic as their own ideas.

They get told whether their latest, greatest widget works or not, but no one ever tells them the widget is stupid and annoying.

They're all overly impressed with their own cleverness.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to