As you pointed out previously, photo.net members see a lot less
advertising. So that's obviously a critical difference in perception.
I'm hanging around on photo.net, but I'm also turning more to my own
sites to market my photography. I have a virtual tour site up and
running, although it's not complete, and I'm working on a wedding
site. Of course to make them work, I'll have to buy advertising. No
smiley. But targeted web advertising is a bargain. That's why we see
so much of it.
BTW, thanks again for the help with the panos. You were right.
800K .mov files are quite adequate for my purposes.
Paul
On Nov 26, 2008, at 6:40 AM, David Savage wrote:
Before the recent Photo.net site redesign I would have agreed with all
of what you just said, but since they implemented banner advertising
on every bloody page it crawls in comparison to the old layout. I used
to love browsing photo.net, but not any more.
I used to hate Flickr, but once you really start using it the +'s
outweigh it's -'s.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/11/26 PN Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The curl over ads don't bother me. They go away immediately.
Advertising is
good. It pays bills. I love advertising.
I far prefer photo.net to flickr. Much nicer presentation, much
faster, much
more available information.
But I would appreciate it if the rest of you would stop using
flickr:-).
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
