20mm on FF is, for me, the boundary between wide and ultra-wide. Having gone wider, I can't go back for some uses. I'd rather have a 17 and 28mm pair of primes than a 20-35mm zoom.
I would be interested in seeing how the 20-35 performs on FF digital. But I doubt it matches the Nikkor 14-24 in performance (or size and cost). -Adam On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:44 PM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes but I'm all set for FF Pentax, I've still got my 20-35mm FA 4.0 really > nice as an ultra wide on film,. even better as a ~28 mm equivalent on APS-C > and also no where near $2000 when new. It breaks my heart that it's been > discontinued. > > Adam Maas wrote: >> >> And that's a crop lens. So it would be one of the ways of saving $2000 >> dollars by running in DX crop mode. It sucks at 18mm on FF (Been >> there, done that with the Tokina on an F100, it's not anything >> approaching a solution for FF use). >> >> Truly good ultra-wide zooms for F mount come down to the 14-24 f2.8 >> (the king of ultra-wide zoom performance on any mount right now, beats >> every prime in its range except the 21 Distagon) at $2k CDN and the >> 17-35 f2.8 AF-S which gets worse as it gets wider but is extremely >> good at 35mm. That's around $1500CDN new if you can actually find one. >> >> -Adam >> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:24 AM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hum, last I herd the Pentax 12-24 was pretty decent, and that doesn't >>> cost >>> anywhere near to $2000. The Tokina version might or might not be SMC but >>> it >>> has a pretty good reputation. I always considered 18mm pretty much ultra >>> wide on 35mm. >>> >>> Adam Maas wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:15 AM, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "David Savage" >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nikon's DX lenses work on the D3/D700. Admittedly at a "cropped" >>>>>> resolution, >>>>>> but they do work. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What's the point of shelling out the bucks for a full frame DSLR, if >>>>> you're >>>>> only going to be able to shoot "cropped" because the lenses won't cover >>>>> the >>>>> full frame? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> So you don't have to shell out an extra $2000 right away to get a good >>>> ultra-wide zoom. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone. >>> --Al Capone. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone. > --Al Capone. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
