My $.02 on the issue.
Since the book was so well done & I don't mean just the images, I'm happy to
go along with what the editors come up with regarding the next book.
Mark's (and the editors) suggestions make sense to me as he (and them) were
the one's who put the time in to pull it off. Without his input this would
just be 'a bunch of photos *in* a book'.
Now if someone else wants to put a book together.....
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Roberts" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PDML PHOTO ANNUAL 2008-2009 Book Review TEASE
Cotty wrote:
I submitted two photos to the book but only one made it in - here is the
one that didn't:
<http://www.cottysnaps.com/blog.html>
It's not a particularly strong pic, but I like it. I appreciate that
brevity meant I did not have 2 pics in, but it would have been nice. I
think one photographer, one submission, one entry.
We appreciate your understanding. It was very difficult to assemble the
book and we ended up not using some good photos because we couldn't pair
them effectively (enough) with another work or fit them into the flow we
were trying for in the whole book. Not that we succeeded entirely at
either, but I think it worked well over all. The intent always was to make
a coherent book, not just a bunch of photos *in* a book.
Anyway, it will be one photo per photographer next time around.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
