Thanks, Mark. Perhaps some others were aware of the price break page limit consideration, but guess I missed it. I will accept that it must have been a significant factor.
Jack --- On Sun, 3/1/09, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: PDML PHOTO ANNUAL 2008-2009 Book Review TEASE > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009, 4:41 PM > Jack Davis wrote: > > Now, I don't need to ask. I have been wondering > and was about to > > ask, why some works were not included. Since it seems > that only a > > very few were excluded, it must not be due to a > limited number of > > pages. > > In fact, it *was* because of the limited number of pages. > (There was a substantial price difference for Blurb books > over 120 pages.) > As editors, we considered various solutions to the problem > of having more photos than pages; printing a few, slightly > smaller, two to a page, for example. In the end, there was > no perfect solution, so we did the best we could to include > at least one from each photographer while keeping a unified > feel to the book to the greatest extent possible. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
