I had some nice results with TMax 400 processed in D-76 1:1. However,
overdevelopment or overexposure is a killer with this film.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2009, at 1:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Apr 1, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On the subject of Tonal Differentiation and pushing Tri-X beats both
TMax 400 and Delta 400 silly.
TMax 400 at ASA 3200 has the same tonal and grain qualities as Tri-
X at ASA
800. Tri-X at ASA 3200 looks like monkey dung.
But, since I no longer shoot or process film other than as a once
in a great
while diversion, I don't really care anymore either.
Godfrey
Grain yes, tonal no. And TMax 400 looks like monkey dung at 400 and
just gets worse from there.
I do shoot a fair bit of B&W film still, so I do care (Although I've
been on an HP5+ kick of late)
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
