On Apr 1, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Regards the TMax 400 vs Tri-X debate: I felt the same when I first
started
using TMax 400. Then I found out how to expose and process it
correctly, and
it made Tri-X look quaint.
Lets leave it as I've yet to see a TMax shot from anyone that inclines
me to give up Tri-X. And I've seen a lot of TMax work. Can you produce
good work from TMax? Sure. Will it have less grain than Tri-X? Sure.
Will it have better tonality? Nope. At best it will match Tri-X.
I'm well aware of how to expose and develop TMax 100 & 400 to good
effect. I just find them inferior to the alternatives.
I accept that we will disagree.
After thirty years of using Tri-X, I was delighted to find TMax did a
better job.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
