----- Original Message ----- From: "JC OConnell" Subject: RE: DA* 60-250 at B&H
> None of this makes any sense to me. The point of medium format in > the film era was higher quality than 35mm. But it didnt skip from > 35mm to large format, there was 645, 6x6, 6x7, then 4x5. Going from > aps to 645 ( asumming they do ff 6x4.5, less than that might as well > do 35mm 24x36mm) is like skipping the more reasonable sizes in terms > of cost, size, weight, and especially lens availablity. I think the > market for FF digital (24x35mm)would be much greater appeal than > going to 645 or 67. A lot of things don't make sense to you. I find it very sad in a way. Some depends on if you are sitting on 20k-30k worth of 645 glass, doesn't it? There are other advantages that a 645 digital offers over small format cameras. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
