Tried it with various FA, DA, DA* and A* lenses. :-( 2009/7/12 Graydon <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 11:03:38AM +0200, AlunFoto scripsit: >> Could I bother you guys to take a look at this comparison: >> http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/flashAnomaly/flashtest.html >> >> All shots obtained at a working distance of 2 meters, and with >> constant ambient light. The 48mm series stands quite distinctly apart. > > That it does! > >> Graydon and John (or others), if you still think this is rationally >> explainable by other factors than a faulty flash, please let me know. > > Faulty camera? > > I have zero experience with dedicated flash units, but that looks > generally a bit erratic, not just the part where the 48mm setting fries > the subject with excessive photons. > > So either the flash has a problem at 48 (quench speed, just plain too > much omph, etc.) or the camera is asking for more than it needs for some > reason. > > Have you tried this with a different lens? Preferably a prime lens with > a wide max aperture? > > -- Graydon > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. >
-- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
